There does not seem to be any pride in the work that people do – both in terms of factual quality or in terms of the quality of the work itself.
If you are implementing new processes or providing advice and guidance in areas from employment law to data protection law, there has to be attention to detail and checking that what you are stating is fact is fact.
I saw one paper where the author said “I was answering the question that I was asked.”
That is fine except where the answer being provided puts one side of the organisation out of alignment with the other side of the organisation.
Pointing that out does not mean you are risk adverse – it simply means that policies and processes need to reflect the organisation as a whole.